Multi-omics approach identifies PI3 as a biomarker for disease severity and hyper-keratinization in psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. Psoriasis severity evaluation is important for clinicians in the assessment of disease severity and subsequent clinical decision making. However, no objective biomarker is available for accurately evaluating disease severity in psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To define and compare biomarkers of disease severity and progression in psoriatic skin. METHODS: We performed proteome profiling to study the proteins circulating in the serum from patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, and transcriptome sequencing to investigate the gene expression in skin from the same cohort. We then used machine learning approaches to evaluate different biomarker candidates across several independent cohorts. In order to reveal the cell-type specificity of different biomarkers, we also analyzed a single-cell dataset of skin samples. In-situ staining was applied for the validation of biomarker expression. RESULTS: We identified that the peptidase inhibitor 3 (PI3) was significantly correlated with the corresponding local skin gene expression, and was associated with disease severity. We applied machine learning methods to confirm that PI3 was an effective psoriasis classifier, Finally, we validated PI3 as psoriasis biomarker using in-situ staining and public datasets. Single-cell data and in-situ staining indicated that PI3 was specifically highly expressed in keratinocytes from psoriatic lesions. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that PI3 may be a psoriasis-specific biomarker for disease severity and hyper-keratinization.

Multi-omics integration reveals a core network involved in host defence and hyperkeratinization in psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES: The precise pathogenesis of psoriasis remains incompletely explored. We aimed to better understand the underlying mechanisms of psoriasis, using a systems biology approach based on transcriptomics and microbiome profiling. METHODS: We collected the skin tissue biopsies and swabs in both lesional and non-lesional skin of 13 patients with psoriasis, 15 patients with psoriatic arthritis and healthy skin from 12 patients with ankylosing spondylitis. To study the similarities and differences in the molecular profiles between these three conditions, and the associations between the host defence and microbiota composition, we performed high-throughput RNA-sequencing to quantify the gene expression profile in tissues. The metagenomic composition of 16S on local skin sites was quantified by clustering amplicon sequences and counted into operational taxonomic units. We further analysed associations between the transcriptome and microbiome profiling. RESULTS: We found that lesional and non-lesional samples were remarkably different in terms of their transcriptome profiles. The functional annotation of differentially expressed genes showed a major enrichment in neutrophil activation. By using co-expression gene networks, we identified a gene module that was associated with local psoriasis severity at the site of biopsy. From this module, we found a 'core' set of genes that was functionally involved in neutrophil activation, epidermal cell differentiation and response to bacteria. Skin microbiome analysis revealed that the abundances of Enhydrobacter, Micrococcus and Leptotrichia were significantly correlated with the genes in core network. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a core gene network that associated with local disease severity and microbiome composition, involved in the inflammation and hyperkeratinization in psoriatic skin.

Regulatory T cells in psoriatic arthritis: an IL-17A-producing, Foxp3intCD161 + RORγt + ICOS + phenotype, that associates with the presence of ADAMTSL5 autoantibodies.

In psoriatic arthritis (PsA), predisposing class I HLA alleles, the presence of synovial clonally proliferated CD8 + T cells and autoantibodies all point towards the loss of immune tolerance. However, the key mechanisms that lead to immune dysregulation are not fully understood. In other types of inflammatory arthritis, T regulatory cell (Treg) dysfunction and plasticity at sites of inflammation were suggested to negatively affect peripheral tolerance. We here addressed if Treg variances associate with psoriatic disease. We collected clinical data, sera and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 13 healthy controls, 21 psoriasis and 21 PsA patients. In addition, we obtained synovial fluid mononuclear cells from 6 PsA patients. We studied characteristics of CD4 + CD25 + CD127loFoxp3 + Tregs by flow cytometry and used ELISA to quantify antibodies against ADAMTSL5, a recently discovered autoantigen in psoriatic disease. In comparison with their circulating counterparts, Tregs from inflamed joints express increased levels of ICOS, CTLA-4 and TIGIT. Furthermore, synovial fluid-derived Tregs have a distinct phenotype, characterized by IL-17A production and upregulation of CD161 and RORγt. We identified a subset of Tregs with intermediate Foxp3 expression as the major cytokine producer. Furthermore, ICOS + Tregs associate with PsA disease activity as measured by PASDAS. Lastly, we observed that presence of the Foxp3int Tregs associates with an increased abundance of anti-ADAMTSL5 autoantibodies. Tregs derived from the inflammatory environment of inflamed PsA joints exhibit a distinct phenotype, which associates with loss of peripheral immune tolerance in psoriatic disease.

TOFA-PREDICT study protocol: a stratification trial to determine key immunological factors predicting tofacitinib efficacy and drug-free remission in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

INTRODUCTION: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, inflammatory, musculoskeletal disease that affects up to 30% of patients with psoriasis. Current challenges in clinical care and research include personalised treatment, understanding the divergence of therapy response and unravelling the multifactorial pathophysiology of this complex disease. Moreover, there is an urgent clinical need to predict, assess and understand the cellular and molecular pathways underlying the response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The TOFA-PREDICT clinical trial addresses this need. Our primary objective is to determine key immunological factors predicting tofacitinib efficacy and drug-free remission in PsA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this investigator-initiated, phase III, multicentre, open-label, four-arm randomised controlled trial, we plan to integrate clinical, molecular and imaging parameters of 160 patients with PsA. DMARD-naïve patients are randomised to methotrexate or tofacitinib. Additionally, patients who are non-responsive to conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs continue their current csDMARD and are randomised to etanercept or tofacitinib. This results in four arms each with 40 patients. Patients are followed for 1 year. Treatment response is defined as minimal disease activity at week 16. Clinical data, biosamples and images are collected at baseline, 4 weeks and 16 weeks; at treatment failure (treatment switch) and 52 weeks. For the first 80 patients, we will use a systems medicine approach to assess multiomics biomarkers and develop a prediction model for treatment response. Subsequently, data from the second 80 patients will be used for validation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee in Utrecht, Netherlands, is registered in the European Clinical Trials Database and is carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study's progress is monitored by Julius Clinical, a science-driven contract research organisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT: 2017-003900-28.

Do Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Have More Severe Skin Disease than Patients with Psoriasis Only? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Early identification of patients at risk of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is essential to facilitate early diagnosis and improve clinical outcomes. Severe cutaneous psoriasis has been proposed to be associated with PsA, but a recent assessment of the evidence is lacking. Therefore, in this systematic review, we address the association of psoriasis skin severity with the presence and development of PsA. SUMMARY: We included articles from a review published in 2014 and supplemented these with recent literature by performing an additional systematic search to identify studies published between 1 January 2013 and 11 February 2021. A meta-analysis was performed when sufficient comparable evidence was available. Of 2,000 screened articles, we included 29 in the analysis, of which 16 were identified by our updated search. Nineteen studies reported psoriasis severity as psoriasis area and severity index (PASI), ten studies as body surface area (BSA), and two studies as "number of affected sites." Most studies show that more extensive skin disease is associated with the presence of PsA. The quantitative pooled analyses demonstrate higher PASI (mean difference [Δ] 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-2.89) and higher BSA (Δ 5.31; 95% CI 1.78-8.83) in patients with PsA as compared to psoriasis patients without PsA. Results from prospective studies - that assess the risk of future development of PsA in psoriasis patients - were inconclusive. KEY MESSAGES: In patients with psoriasis, more severe skin involvement is associated with the presence of PsA, underpinning the importance of optimal dermatology-rheumatology collaboration in clinical care. There are insufficient data to support the use of psoriasis skin severity to predict the future development of PsA in psoriasis patients.

Activation-induced colocalisation of SCAMP5 with IFNα in human plasmacytoid dendritic cells.

INTRODUCTION: Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are the main producers of type I interferon (IFN) in SLE. pDCs express high secretory carrier membrane protein 5 (SCAMP5). Recent work in transfected HEK cells connects SCAMP5 to the type I IFN secretory pathway. To further study the role of SCAMP5 in IFNα secretion by pDCs, we focused on the subcellular distribution of SCAMP5 in human pDCs freshly isolated from peripheral blood. METHODS: We measured SCAMP5 expression by flow cytometry in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy subjects (n=8). Next, we assessed the colocalisation of SCAMP5 with IFNα in pDCs of healthy subjects (n=4) by evaluating bright detail similarity (BDS) scores using ImageStream technology. RESULTS: We confirm that SCAMP5 is highly expressed by pDCs derived from peripheral blood. In activated pDCs, we show that SCAMP5 colocalises with IFNα (mean BDS 2.0±0.1; BDS >2.0 in 44% of pDCs). CONCLUSION: SCAMP5 colocalises with IFNα in activated human pDCs, in support of a role of this trafficking protein in the secretion of type I IFN by pDCs.

Tissue-Resident Memory CD8+ T Cells From Skin Differentiate Psoriatic Arthritis From Psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare immune cell phenotype and function in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) versus psoriasis in order to better understand the pathogenesis of PsA. METHODS: In-depth immunophenotyping of different T cell and dendritic cell subsets was performed in patients with PsA, psoriasis, or axial spondyloarthritis and healthy controls. Subsequently, we analyzed cells from peripheral blood, synovial fluid (SF), and skin biopsy specimens using flow cytometry, along with high-throughput transcriptome analyses and functional assays on the specific cell populations that appeared to differentiate PsA from psoriasis. RESULTS: Compared to healthy controls, the peripheral blood of patients with PsA was characterized by an increase in regulatory CD4+ T cells and interleukin-17A (IL-17A) and IL-22 coproducing CD8+ T cells. One population specifically differentiated PsA from psoriasis: i.e., CD8+CCR10+ T cells were enriched in PsA. CD8+CCR10+ T cells expressed high levels of DNAX accessory molecule 1 and were effector memory cells that coexpressed skin-homing receptors CCR4 and cutaneous lymphocyte antigen. CD8+CCR10+ T cells were detected under inflammatory and homeostatic conditions in skin, but were not enriched in SF. Gene profiling further revealed that CD8+CCR10+ T cells expressed GATA3, FOXP3, and core transcriptional signature of tissue-resident memory T cells, including CD103. Specific genes, including RORC, IFNAR1, and ERAP1, were up-regulated in PsA compared to psoriasis. CD8+CCR10+ T cells were endowed with a Tc2/22-like cytokine profile, lacked cytotoxic potential, and displayed overall regulatory function. CONCLUSION: Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells derived from the skin are enhanced in the circulation of patients with PsA compared to patients with psoriasis alone. This may indicate that aberrances in cutaneous tissue homeostasis contribute to arthritis development.

DNAM1 and TIGIT balance the T cell response, with low T cell TIGIT expression corresponding to inflammation in psoriatic disease.

Objectives: Signals at the contact site of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and T cells help orchestrate the adaptive immune response. CD155 on APCs can interact with the stimulatory receptor DNAM1 or inhibitory receptor TIGIT on T cells. The CD155/DNAM1/TIGIT axis is under extensive investigation as immunotherapy target in inflammatory diseases including cancer, chronic infection and autoimmune diseases. We investigated a possible role for CD155/DNAM1/TIGIT signaling in psoriatic disease. Methods: By flow cytometry, we analyzed peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with psoriasis (n = 20) or psoriatic arthritis (n = 21), and healthy individuals (n = 7). We measured CD155, TIGIT, and DNAM1 expression on leukocyte subsets and compared activation-induced cytokine production between CD155-positive and CD155-negative APCs. We assessed the effects of TIGIT and DNAM1 blockade on T cell activation, and related the expression of CD155/DNAM1/TIGIT axis molecules to measures of disease activity. Results: High CD155 expression associates with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production in myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DC). In CD1c+ myeloid DC, activation-induced CD155 expression associates with increased HLA-DR expression. CD8 T cells - but not CD4 T cells - express high levels of TIGIT. DNAM1 blockade decreases T cell pro-inflammatory cytokine production, while TIGIT blockade increased T cell proliferation. Finally, T cell TIGIT expression shows an inverse correlation with inflammation biomarkers in psoriatic disease. Conclusion: CD155 is increased on pro-inflammatory APCs, while the receptors DNAM1 and TIGIT expressed on T cells balance the inflammatory response by T cells. In psoriatic disease, low TIGIT expression on T cells is associated with systemic inflammation.

Broad proteomic screen reveals shared serum proteomic signature in patients with psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis without arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify novel serum proteins involved in the pathogenesis of PsA as compared with healthy controls, psoriasis (Pso) and AS, and to explore which proteins best correlated to major clinical features of the disease. METHODS: A high-throughput serum biomarker platform (Olink) was used to assess the level of 951 unique proteins in serum of patients with PsA (n = 20), Pso (n = 18) and AS (n = 19), as well as healthy controls (HC, n = 20). Pso and PsA were matched for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and other clinical parameters. RESULTS: We found 68 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in PsA as compared with HC. Of those DEPs, 48 proteins (71%) were also dysregulated in Pso and/or AS. Strikingly, there were no DEPs when comparing PsA with Pso directly. On the contrary, hierarchical cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling revealed that HC clustered distinctly from all patients, and that PsA and Pso grouped together. The number of swollen joints had the strongest positive correlation to ICAM-1 (r = 0.81, P < 0.001) and CCL18 (0.76, P < 0.001). PASI score was best correlated to PI3 (r = 0.54, P < 0.001) and IL-17 receptor A (r = -0.51, P < 0.01). There were more proteins correlated to PASI score when analysing Pso and PsA patients separately, as compared with analysing Pso and PsA patients pooled together. CONCLUSION: PsA and Pso patients share a serum proteomic signature, which supports the concept of a single psoriatic spectrum of disease. Future studies should target skin and synovial tissues to uncover differences in local factors driving arthritis development in Pso.

First-line csDMARD monotherapy drug retention in psoriatic arthritis: methotrexate outperforms sulfasalazine.

OBJECTIVES: Conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) are the first-line treatment for PsA, but there is conflicting data regarding their efficacy and scarce reports describing the duration of use (drug retention) of csDMARD in this population. Their position in treatment recommendations is a matter of growing debate due to the availability of alternative treatment options with higher levels of evidence. We aimed to study drug retention and predictors for drug retention among PsA patients receiving first-line csDMARD monotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in DMARD-naïve adult PsA patients in whom a first csDMARD was prescribed as monotherapy primarily to treat PsA-related symptoms. The main outcome was time to failure of the csDMARD (i.e. stopping the csDMARD or adding another DMARD). RESULTS: A total of 187 patients were included, who were mainly prescribed MTX (n = 163) or SSZ (n = 21). The pooled median drug retention time was 31.8 months (interquartile range 9.04-110). Drug retention was significantly higher in MTX (median 34.5 months; interquartile range 9.60-123) as compared with SSZ-treated patients (median 12.0 months; interquartile range 4.80- 55.7) (P =0.016, log-rank test). In multivariable Cox regression, the use of MTX and older age were associated with increased retention. The main reasons for treatment failure were inefficacy (52%) and side effects (28%). Upon failure, MTX treated patients were more commonly, subsequently treated with a biologic DMARD compared with SSZ (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: MTX outperforms SSZ as a first-line csDMARD in DMARD-naïve PsA patients with respect to monotherapy drug retention in daily clinical practice.

Emerging molecular biomarkers for predicting therapy response in psoriatic arthritis: A review of literature.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous, chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disorder that affects ~0.1% of the population. PsA may severely impact quality-of-life and constitutes a significant economic burden on our health care system. While early effective treatment is deemed essential to prevent irreversible joint damage and functional impairment, not all patients respond to the same disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). DMARD options for PsA are rapidly evolving, yet only 50-60% of patients show a satisfactory response to their first-line DMARD therapy. Hence, there is an urgent medical need to predict which patients benefit from a particular treatment. To this end, molecular biomarkers capable of predicting therapeutic response are currently being scrutinized in clinical studies, that together should build a framework for clinical guidelines that improve personalized targeted treatment. In this review new developments within the field of biomarker discovery for predicting therapeutic response to DMARDs in PsA are examined.

[Spectrum of psoriatic conditions]. / Spectrum van psoriatische aandoeningen.

Psoriasis is a common immune-mediated inflammatory condition that primarily affects skin and nails. 6-41% of psoriasis patients develop psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The ways in which PsA can manifest itself include peripheral arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, dactylitis and enthesitis. This heterogeneous clinical picture makes it sometimes difficult to recognise PsA,potentially resulting in permanent joint damage and functional impairments. Some people see psoriasis and PsA as 2 manifestations of a single disease because the multifactorial origins of psoriasis and PsA are largely overlapping. Psoriatic conditions are associated with a high burden of disease, reduced quality of life and comorbidities, including psychiatric and cardiovascular conditions. In recent years, several immunological pathways, immune cells and cytokines have been identified as important factors in pathophysiology and as new therapeutic targets. For many PsA patients treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs leads to significant improvement of symptoms and quality of life.

Respiratory syncytial virus prevention and asthma in healthy preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is associated with subsequent wheeze and asthma. We previously reported on the causal relationship between prevention of RSV infection during infancy and reduced frequency of subsequent wheeze using a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (MAKI). We continued follow-up and analysed the effect of RSV prevention during infancy on asthma and lung function at age 6 years. METHODS: We studied 429 infants born at 32-35 weeks of gestation between 2008-10 who had randomly received either palivizumab for RSV immunoprophylaxis or placebo during the RSV season of their first year of life. After the first year of follow-up, single, assessor-blind follow-up of children continued until they were aged 6 years. Primary outcomes were parent-reported current asthma and forced expiratory volume in 0·5 s (FEV0·5). The trial is registered in the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN73641710. FINDINGS: 395 (92%) of 429 participants completed this 6-year follow-up study. Parent-reported current asthma was reported in 28 (14·1%) of 199 children in the RSV prevention group and 47 (24·0%) of 196 children in the placebo group (absolute risk reduction [ARR] 9·9%, 95% CI 2·2 to 17·6). The difference in current asthma, which was a composite endpoint, was due to a difference in infrequent wheeze (one to three episodes in the past year; 12 [6·0%] of 199 vs 26 [13·4%] of 194, ARR 7·4%, 95% CI 1·5 to 13·2). FEV0·5 percentage predicted values were similar between the RSV prevention group (89·1% [SD 10·6]) and placebo group (90·1% [11·1]), with a mean difference of 1·0 (95% CI -1·3 to 3·3). The proportion of children with current physician-diagnosed asthma was similar between the RSV prevention group (19 [10·3%] of 185) and placebo group (18 [9·9%] of 182), with an ARR of -0·4 (95% CI -6·5 to 5·8). INTERPRETATION: In otherwise healthy preterm infants, this single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial showed that RSV prevention did not have a major effect on current asthma or lung function at age 6 years. Future research will inform on the effect of RSV prevention on asthma at school age in the general population. FUNDING: AbbVie.

Methotrexate intolerance in oral and subcutaneous administration in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a cross-sectional, observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). In Dutch patients, MTX intolerance occurred frequently and was associated with subcutaneous (SC) administration. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of MTX intolerance and its association with the route of administration in a German cohort of JIA patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of JIA patients on MTX was performed. Primary outcome was MTX intolerance, which was determined using the validated Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS) questionnaire. The prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse effects and MTX intolerance was compared between patients on MTX SC and MTX administered orally (PO). RESULTS: Of 179 JIA patients on MTX, 73 (40.8%) were intolerant. The odds of MTX intolerance were higher in patients using MTX exclusively SC compared to exclusively PO (adjusted odds ratio 3.37 [95% confidence interval 1.19-10.0]). There was strong evidence that the former experienced more behavioural complaints (76.1% vs. 47.4%, p=0.001) and weak evidence that they experienced more abdominal pain after MTX intake (43.5% vs. 27.4%, p=0.056). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MTX intolerance was high and exclusively SC administration of MTX was associated with MTX intolerance and behavioural adverse effects. The prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse effects was at least as high as in patients on MTX PO. The frequently held assumption that SC causes fewer side effects than PO seems unwarranted. Definite answers about the differences between SC and PO administration with respect to safety and efficacy should be obtained by randomised trials.